Civil War Interactive Discussion Board Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register

Darkest of Days

 Moderated by: javal1 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2   
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Oldie but a goodie!!!  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Thu Sep 18th, 2008 01:29 am
  PM Quote Reply
21st Post
hardy545
Member
 

Joined: Tue Sep 2nd, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 4
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 Here is a link which defends his decsion . Interesting, short read. I still contend he should have been court martialed for disobeying orders that jeopardized "The Rest" of the AoP .

http://polyticks.com/Hole/Teaser.htm

Last edited on Thu Sep 18th, 2008 01:39 am by hardy545

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Thu Sep 18th, 2008 01:58 am
  PM Quote Reply
22nd Post
pamc153PA
Member
 

Joined: Sat Jun 14th, 2008
Location: Boyertown, Pennsylvania USA
Posts: 344
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Ah, Crazy D, don't get me started on Barlow and the 11th Corps, not with the 153PA being my soft spot. 

I suspect that one thing Barlow had going for him was that he, and just about everyone else, could point the finger at those damn Dutchmen, who were cowards at Chancellorsville, and showed they were so again at Gettysburg--so went the feelings of the nation at that time about the German immigrants. So all Barlow had to do was say, "See, it wasn't me, they just don't listen and they don't fight," and everyone--this not being the PC present time--goes, "True, very true." And Barlow can pawn his own mistakes and prejudices off and cover his behind. Sickles was a good spin doctor, but he didn't have a basically unliked and unsupported immigrant population to dump on like Barlow did.

Whew! See what happens when you mention Barlow to me??;)

Pam

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Thu Sep 18th, 2008 02:53 am
  PM Quote Reply
23rd Post
Crazy Delawares
Member


Joined: Fri Feb 22nd, 2008
Location: New Jersey USA
Posts: 167
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I feel your rage, Pam! I feel your rage!

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Thu Sep 18th, 2008 11:06 am
  PM Quote Reply
24th Post
gettysburgerrn
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 8th, 2007
Location: Masapequa, Ny, USA
Posts: 133
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I agree Pam and just based on the 11th corps experience at Chancellorsville that tainted them in the eyes of many. Barlow was then looking like the savior trying to stop the evil rebel hordes when his troops ran he didnt have 2nd corps, and 5th corps , and unlimited artillery, to back him up). That whole myth with him and Gordon helped him too no doubt..

ken

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Thu Sep 18th, 2008 01:47 pm
  PM Quote Reply
25th Post
j harold 587
Member
 

Joined: Tue Jun 12th, 2007
Location: Wilmington, Ohio USA
Posts: 119
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Having recently completed The First Day by Phantz I got the impression that though Barlow was wrong to deploy on the high ground (as was Sickles) the eleventh Corps was basiclly over run by superior numbers. Do I need to take another look? Just when I thought I was getting a good handle on that action.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Thu Sep 18th, 2008 04:00 pm
  PM Quote Reply
26th Post
PvtClewell
Member


Joined: Wed Jun 13th, 2007
Location: North Carolina USA
Posts: 427
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
j harold

I believe your initial impression is correct.

This summer our little group had an LBG tour of the 11th Corps, and our guide suggested that Barlow would have been better served maintaining a line closer to town, and specifically, nearer the Almshouse complex.

I also found out, Pam and Joe, that the 153rd PA actually had skirmishers on the west bank of Rock Creek when Early's Division came thundering upon Blocher's Knoll. Gordon's brigade hammered the 11th Corps' unanchored and unprotected right flank. If you look at the map on page 233 of Pfanz' book, you can see that Hays and Avery brigades had an unopposed wide open lane toward Gettysburg. Little wonder the 11th Corps crumpled.

They did OK on East Cemetery Hill the next day, though.

At least, that's how I see it.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri Sep 19th, 2008 01:00 am
  PM Quote Reply
27th Post
Crazy Delawares
Member


Joined: Fri Feb 22nd, 2008
Location: New Jersey USA
Posts: 167
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I believe you're dead on, Private!

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Sep 19th, 2008 03:46 pm
  PM Quote Reply
28th Post
gettysburgerrn
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 8th, 2007
Location: Masapequa, Ny, USA
Posts: 133
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Basically the 11th corps was put in an untenable position, that would have been untenable for any troops. Early's men crashed down from a perfect position. The almshouse position was better but not an enviable position either...the position was commanded by the Bloecher's knoll position but more compact and with a somewhat less exposed flank.

One must also consider the withdrawal of Devin's cavalry brigade which was covering that flank (I think) and I would imagine knew of the approach of Early's division. What the authorities that recieved any reports did with that information I am not sure of ...just a thought...

BTW Doles' handling of his brigade was masterful in defeating other elements of 11th corps..

ken

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

Current time is 09:15 pm Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2     
Civil War Interactive Discussion Board > Civil War Talk > Battles and Campaigns > Battle of Gettysburg > Oldie but a goodie!!! Top



Lead Theme By: Di @ UltraBB
UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.3265 seconds (8% database + 92% PHP). 24 queries executed.