Civil War Interactive Discussion Board Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register


 Moderated by: javal1
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Gods and Generals  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Wed Jun 17th, 2009 01:30 am
  PM Quote Reply
1st Post
gman
Member
 

Joined: Thu May 14th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 2
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I loved Gettysburg but I thought G&G was too much of a Stonewall lovefest. After he died, I thought he was going to rise on the 3rd day.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Wed Jun 17th, 2009 12:25 pm
  PM Quote Reply
2nd Post
borderuffian
Member


Joined: Fri Mar 13th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 104
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
G&G would have worked better as a biography of Stonewall Jackson.

And of course the title should have been Stonewall.

Last edited on Wed Jun 17th, 2009 12:26 pm by borderuffian

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Wed Jun 17th, 2009 08:45 pm
  PM Quote Reply
3rd Post
Basiliximab
Member
 

Joined: Sun Jun 7th, 2009
Location: Nevada USA
Posts: 8
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
borderuffian wrote: G&G would have worked better as a biography of Stonewall Jackson.



Yeah, I agree with that. What a great topic for a biography; of course, it would only be a good film if they show both the merits and flaws of Jackson (wouldn't want to sit through another Jackson-worship fest). I think that's what bothered me the most about G&G and the Jackson portrayal in general. I've read about how people liked Lang's performance, and I've no doubt he's a talented actor; however, what endears me the most to a character (and an actor's performance of that character) is the portrayal of their flaws, and I cannot remember any in his Jackson character (though it's been a while since I've seen the film).

There are many other civil war biographies that would make good movies though; however, when I was reading a Jackson biography a few months back, I remember thinking: what a good movie this would make--and almost all the scenes I had played out in my mind were where we can see negative aspects of Jackson's character.

Last edited on Wed Jun 17th, 2009 11:59 pm by Basiliximab

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Thu Jun 24th, 2010 06:18 pm
  PM Quote Reply
4th Post
blueshawk1
Member


Joined: Tue Jun 22nd, 2010
Location:  
Posts: 14
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
gman wrote: I loved Gettysburg but I thought G&G was too much of a Stonewall lovefest. After he died, I thought he was going to rise on the 3rd day.
Hahaaaa, you're right.
Another thing that stood out for me is the amount of time spent in the movie with the Generals and others, standing around making some profound statements, almost philosophical statements.
I realize the times were different, and they often had a romantic way of talking, but I think they went WAY overboard with all of that in G&G.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Thu Aug 19th, 2010 08:41 am
  PM Quote Reply
5th Post
Hellcat
Person


Joined: Tue Nov 15th, 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 679
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
That's not a movie I'm particulary fond of mainly because I had already read the book and was quite disappointed in the conversion from book to movie. Gettysburg follows The Killer Angels better than Gods and Generals follows Gods and Generals. And it's not like this is a case of a novelization of a movie where the author has access to a script and writes based on that, including elements that may later be dropped from the final cut or were never in the script to begin with. Shaara's novel was first released in 1996. It was a few years before the movie began filming (some of the filming occured on 9/11).

Certainly I can't say it hadn't been picked up to be filmed after the book came out, but I wish it had followed the book better. Supposedly there is a six hour director's cut that has yet to be released on DVD. If released and if it better follows the book that might change my mind about the movie. But from some of what I've read it'd probably more annoy me.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Thu Aug 19th, 2010 02:24 pm
  PM Quote Reply
6th Post
9Bama
Member
 

Joined: Mon May 10th, 2010
Location:  
Posts: 106
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I can find little to like about the movie, but I did enjoy the book. The two share only a title IMHO. They are completely different, except for the names of the characters...but then, those were pretty much set about 150 years ago!

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

You have chosen to ignore ssnwtlove. click Here to view this post

Current time is 01:35 am  
Civil War Interactive Discussion Board > Civil War Entertainment: Books, Movies, Music & Art > Civil War in Movies and on TV > Gods and Generals Top



Lead Theme By: Di @ UltraBB
UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.2125 seconds (14% database + 86% PHP). 28 queries executed.