Civil War Interactive Discussion Board Home
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register


Discharged for Good For Nothingness - Other People of the Civil War - The Participants of the War - Mikitary & Civilian - Civil War Interactive Discussion Board
 Moderated by: javal1
 New Topic   Reply   Printer Friendly 
 Rating:  Rating
AuthorPost
 Posted: Mon Dec 18th, 2006 10:18 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
1st Post
amhistoryguy
Member


Joined: Wed Sep 7th, 2005
Location: Milwaukee - Wisconsin
Posts: 35
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 

  back to top

Anyone who has spent time in the military can tell you
that there are some recruits that just don't belong there.
After the first couple of days, even those recruits might
be prepared to admit that they made a mistake. The army
feels duty bound, however, to make a soldier out of every
recruit. This seems to have been true in the Civil War,
as well as today. Being able to eliminate the men who may
endanger the rest of the unit, or who cannot pull their own
weight, was a skill very new to most volunteer officers.

Arnold Sutermeister was a 31 year old drawing school
instructor. "Sutermeister's Battery" was the product of
some very persuasive Fort Wayne, Indiana city fathers.
Sutermeister and John Otto, a former Prussian artillery
man, set about recruiting the best men they could find in
the Fort Wayne area. Unfortunately, some of their new
recruits proved to be unable or unwilling to adapt to
military life.
One roster of the unit I found listed a number of men
as having been "discharged for disability of good for
nothingness." Not the wording of an "official" discharge,
records at the National Archives revealed that Captain
Sutermeister had found a sympathetic surgeon to help
him fabricate discharges, eliminating problem soldiers
and making the battery more efficient.
Sutermeister's notations on one of these discharges was
that, "he is nothing but an incumberance to the company..."
Another noted that the soldier "was never fit for service &
ought not have been received in the army because he is
insolent and indifferent." While the ailments that the
surgeon filled in may have been valid, I found it fitting that one
man who was discharged, was discharged with the ailment
"coccylgia," which is defined in Dorland's Medical Dictionary
as a pain in the butt region. This seems to have clearly
reflected Sutermeister's opinion of the man quite well.

Regards, Dave Gorski



 Posted: Thu Dec 21st, 2006 12:53 am
   PM  Quote  Reply 
2nd Post
Widow
Member
 

Joined: Tue Sep 19th, 2006
Location: Oakton, Fairfax County, VA
Posts: 321
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 

  back to top

Dave, that's the best yet!

Now I know who Beetle Bailey's ancestor was.

"Coccylgia," huh?  I know several who are incurably afflicted.

Regards, Patty



 Posted: Thu Dec 21st, 2006 02:39 am
   PM  Quote  Reply 
3rd Post
ole
Member


Joined: Sun Oct 22nd, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 2027
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 

  back to top

Dave:

A most interesting example of ordinariness! Who needs forms and bureaucratic BS? If you have to fill in that blank, why not good-for-nothingness? Loved it.

Ken



 Current time is 05:07 pm
Top




UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.1352 seconds (14% database + 86% PHP). 25 queries executed.