 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
Member
| Joined: | Sun Oct 22nd, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2027 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Is there an example of a truly great Civil War general on either side who can never have been said to be ruthless? Is there a general who declined to accept the "victory at all costs" philosophy and left an important battle or declined to implement a tactic or strategy because the cost of doing so "at all hazards" would be too great?
Now I'm struck dumb, Fan. I doubt anyone, ever, could have said that better!
My humble thanks.
ole