| View single post by ole | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Mar 20th, 2008 05:24 pm |
|
||||||||||||
|
ole Member
|
Ashbel, I must pitch in on HankC's take. Thomas was much more than adequate. He was very, very good. But I don't think he falls into the category of great. There is a spark within the term "great." Thomas didn't have it. Sherman didn't have it. Sheridan didn't have it. Davis didn't have it. Grant and Lee and Lincoln did have it. I don't know where to go from here. It was just there. ole
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||