|View single post by indy19th|
|Posted: Mon Jun 12th, 2006 02:46 pm||
I am puzzled as to why a 5K foot race at Sharpsburg is offensive. There is plenty of precedent for such events.
Moreover, runners and cyclists already utilize the public roads that pass through various battlefields every day anyway. Like it or not, the roads through these battlefields are publically owned and are already being used for recreational purposes on an every day basis by people who may or may not appreciate what happened there. And, I do think this is a good thing. The more folks who appreciate battlefields -- even if its just for their scenic and asethetic "green space" value -- the more allies we have in the fight for preservation. We need all the help we can get. And if allowing an occasional race or other low impact, non-historical activity illustrates to more people why battlefields are important and earns us more potential allies in the fight for preservation, I say that is a good thing.
Just because there is precedent, doesn't make it right.
Is anyone holding events such as these at cemeteries?
If someone wants to use Hallowed Ground to observe birds/nature, I have no problem with that. And yes, these runners can make for allies, since I have no say whatsoever as to what's allowed in a park, I say we USE them as allies whenever it's to the benefit of preservation.
Some people are under the misguided idea that historic parks are no different from state, recreational parks. If we need to inform people that an historic park is different from any other park, so be it. If they still want to pay their 3 bucks great, if not, that's their choice.
Last edited on Mon Jun 12th, 2006 07:17 pm by