View single post by BloodyBob64
 Posted: Tue Jul 29th, 2008 02:53 am
 PM  Quote  Reply  Full Topic 

Joined: Sun Jul 13th, 2008
Posts: 23

  back to top

I realize that almost every individual in history is probably viewed in a better or worse light today than they actually were.

I haven't done too much research on Stuart, much of what I know of him comes from reading about Lee or other caimpaigns. I tend to get the feeling that he was somewhat overrated in comparison with other rebel calvary officers.

I know I would have taken Forrest over him, but part of me says that I would haven taken Hampton, Morgan and Shelby as well. Does anyone feel the same or is there anyone who has done research and would like to refute this?

 Close Window