View single post by Albert Sailhorst
 Posted: Tue Jul 11th, 2006 03:56 pm
 PM  Quote  Reply  Full Topic 
Albert Sailhorst

Joined: Mon Sep 12th, 2005
Location: Aledo, Illinois USA
Posts: 559

  back to top

My opinion, and it is just an opinion, is that Sherman destroyed civilian property, not military property, which makes him guilty of war crimes (or any such term as may apply). If Gen. Forrest is to be held accountable for an alleged massacre at Ft. Pillow (a military installation, not civilian), then Sherman is certainly guilty of something.


Albert Sailhorst

Scott's Battery

 Close Window