| View single post by indy19th | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri Aug 11th, 2006 01:49 pm |
|
||||||||||||
|
indy19th $user_title
|
Shadowrebel wrote: Indy, If anyone can show me that states could unilaterally secede from the union and also that a confederation of states in rebellion could seize gov't property and smuggle federal munitions into states in rebellion and fire shots in anger at federal installations, I might consider changing my view as well.
Taney was still just one person on a board of nine. He gave his opinion. Congress backed Lincoln. I don't ever remember seeing the Supreme Court cry unconstitutional AFTER Congress backed Lincoln on habeas. (The point you make about Taney having more impact on American history is debateable at least. Afterall she was the first female Supreme Court Justice.) I don't see what the problem is here. If Congress has authority on habeas, like you and your pal Taney say they do, then why is this authority not all encompassing? If it's their authority, why are they not allowed to delegate this authority to the President? If they trust the President enough, during a time of crisis, he should be allowed this authority. He's simply the lightning rod.
Mark Neely is evidently an accomplished writer. Maybe you should pick up HIS book.
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||