| View single post by 19bama46 | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri Jul 17th, 2009 04:40 pm |
|
||||||||||||
|
19bama46 Member
|
susansweet3 wrote: It's a good thought , Ole, as he was recovering from his wounds when he became ill. In my humble opinion, the wound caused the illness which in turn caused the death.. remove the wound and the sequence falls apart.. He died of his wounds.. he however was not a casualty as casualties are counted only if you succommed to wounds the day of the battle IIRC.. it was a way to keep the death rate down... govt was managing that sort of thing even back then... Ed
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||