 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
Member
| Joined: | Wed Feb 10th, 2010 |
| Location: | South Carolina USA |
| Posts: | 212 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
| View single post by csamillerp | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Feb 13th, 2010 05:59 am |
|
||||||||||||
|
csamillerp Member
|
why grant? i would choose hancock, he knew how to inspire his troops and make decisive decisions. his performance in every conflict was amazing. i have always wondered why he was never promoted to army command. at antietam he was promoted from brigadier general to division commander and took on that command very well for the circumstances.
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||