 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
Member
| Joined: | Wed Apr 28th, 2010 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
For me, I guess it depends what time period we're looking at. Certainly Grant wouldn't have been the commander in '62 that he was in '64. I'm always curious how far Kearny might have gone if he'd lived. He might not have been a really skillful general (minus several points for riding right into enemy troops), but he was aggressive.
Adam