| View single post by HankC | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Sun Dec 12th, 2010 01:37 pm |
|
||||||||||||
|
HankC Member
|
Most textbooks correctly answer this question: the means of killing advanced faster then the military tactics. If we took 10% casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan, heads would roll and governments fall. Civil War armies frequently absorbed 30% casualties and they did this over and over. Always keep in mind that 2/3 of the casualties were from disease and many more from poorly treated wounds...
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||