View single post by ole
 Posted: Thu Nov 2nd, 2006 08:06 pm
 PM  Quote  Reply  Full Topic 

Joined: Sun Oct 22nd, 2006
Posts: 2031

  back to top

Now the Chief Ranger's response is more in line with my reaction to Regina's post. Perhaps moving the bones was a no-no, but I stirred a bit when I read that a park ranger dismissed her discovery as animal bones without investigating. Her description and attempts to call attention to the discovery led her to investigate, and I'm willing to believe her conviction that her find was human remains.

Under the described circumstances, I might well have dragged one of the rangers to the site and rubbed his/her nose on it. So the find is ultimately determined to be a pig, or whatever; the point is that it must be investigated. I'll overlook Regina's "indiscretion" and applaud the Chief Ranger's interest.


Last edited on Thu Nov 2nd, 2006 08:08 pm by ole

 Close Window