View single post by BHR62
 Posted: Sun Jan 23rd, 2011 10:04 pm
 PM  Quote  Reply  Full Topic 

Joined: Sun Dec 12th, 2010
Location: Indiana USA
Posts: 242

  back to top

thanks for the clarification.  Hooker from what I've read seems to have had some good leadership qualities.  He rebuilt the morale of the army after Fredricksburg.  He looked after his soldiers welfare.  Made sure they were better fed.  He had done very well at the Division and Corps level.  Like you said he just made a logical but wrong decision.  But after getting the sense knocked out of him by the cannon ball he should have turned over command.  From what I remember didn't his Corp commanders want to stay and fight at the end of the day of the flank attack thinking victory was still possible?  Or was that just revisionism done on their part? 

 Close Window