View single post by brent-beltroneandco
 Posted: Sun Feb 20th, 2011 06:31 pm
 PM  Quote  Reply  Full Topic 
brent-beltroneandco
Member
 

Joined: Sun Feb 20th, 2011
Location:  
Posts: 3
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 

  back to top

Confederate Ram Merrimac Armor Plate ArtifacT

For those who are interested in Civil War relics, this might be an interesting piece. Original piece of armor plate of the famed CSS Virginia (Merrimac) that fought the battle with the Union’s Monitor during the Civil War. The section was one of a number marketed by the Bannerman military goods surplus firm in one of its early catalogues. Bannerman obtained a section of the vessel and cut sections of the metal into approximately three-inch squares, then stamped each with the provenance of its origin.

 Naval history was made on March 8, 1862, when the first Confederate ironclad steamed down the Elizabeth River into Hampton Roads to attack the woodensided U.S. blockading fleet anchored there. Built on the hull of the U.S.S. Merrimac (which had been scuttled and burned when the Federals abandoned the Gosport Navy Yard in April, 1861), the new warship had been christened C.S.S. Virginia, but in common usage retained its original name. After ramming and sinking the twenty-four-gun woodenhulled steam-sailing sloop Cumberland, the Merrimac headed for the fifty-gun frigate Congress. An awestruck Union officer watched the one-sided fight as the Merrimac fired "shot and shell into her with terrific effect, while the shot from the Congress glanced from her iron-plated sloping sides, without doing any apparent injury."
       The results of the first day's fighting at Hampton Roads proved the superiority of iron over wood, but on the next day iron was pitted against iron as the U.S.S. Monitor arrived on the scene. It was just in time to challenge the Merrimac, which was returning to finish off the U.S. blockading squadron. The Confederate ironclad carried more guns than the Union Monitor, but it was slow, clumsy, and prone to engine trouble. The Union prototype, as designed by John Ericsson, was the faster and more maneuverable ironclad, but it lacked the Rebel vessel's brutish size and power. The Merrimac's officers had heard rumors about a Union ironclad, yet, according to Lieutenant Wood: "She could not possibly have made her appearance at a more inopportune time for us...... Lieutenant S. Dana Greene, an officer aboard the Monitor, described the first exchange of gunfire: "The turrets and other parts of the ship were heavily struck, but the shots did not penetrate; the tower was intact, and it continued to revolve. A look of confidence passed over the men's faces, and we believed the Merrimac would not repeat the work she had accomplished the day before." Neither ironclad seriously damaged the other in their one day of fighting, March 9, 1862 though the Merrimac was indeed prevented from attacking any more of the Union's wooden ships. A new age of naval warfare had dawned.



http://www.beltroneandcompany.com/CONFEDERATE_RAM_MERRIMAC.html

Attachment: 148.JPG (Downloaded 12 times)

 Close Window