 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
Member
| Joined: | Fri Apr 13th, 2012 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 22 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
As I said before again and again, two different views opposite to each other can still both have correct interpretation of constitutional law.
Secessionists interpret the 10th admendment has being "the right to succeed!"
On the other hand, Lincoln had to execute his Oath of Office to perserve the Union (the scope of the preamble) as empowered to him by Article 2-section 1-paragraph 8.
The question becomes "which one will benefit the United States the most?" or most importantly, "which one ensures the soverienty of the United States?"
Last edited on Sat Apr 14th, 2012 07:59 pm by ebg