View single post by BHR62
 Posted: Fri Dec 21st, 2012 03:03 pm
 PM  Quote  Reply  Full Topic 

Joined: Sun Dec 12th, 2010
Location: Indiana USA
Posts: 242

  back to top

This is from his acceptance speech at the Democratic Convention:

"The Union was originally formed by the exercise of a spirit of conciliation and compromise. To restore and preserve it, the same spirit must prevail in our councils and in the hearts of the people. The reestablishment of the Union, in all its integrity, is and must continue to be the indispensable condition in any settlement. So soon as it is clear, or even probable, that our present adversaries are ready for peace upon the basis of the Union, we should exhaust all the resources of statesmanship practiced by civilized nations, and taught by the traditions of the American people, consistent with the honor and interests of the country, to secure such peace, reestablish the Union, and guarantee for the future the constitutional rights of every State. The Union is the one condition of peace. We ask no more.

Let me add what I doubt not was, although unexpressed, the sentiment of the convention, as it is of the people they represent, that when any one State is willing to return to the Union it should be received at once with a full guarantee of all its constitutional rights. If a frank, earnest, and persistent effort to obtain these objects should fail, the responsibility for ulterior consequences will fall upon those who remain in arms against the Union, but the Union must be preserved at all hazards. I could not look in the face my gallant comrades of the army and navy who have survived so many bloody battles, and tell them that their labors, and the sacrifices of so many of our slain and wounded brethren, had been in vain, that we had abandoned that Union for which we have so often perilled our lives. A vast majority of our people, whether in the army and navy or at home, would, as I would, hail with unbounded joy the permanent restoration of peace on the basis of the Union under the Constitution, without the effusion of another drop of blood, but no peace can be permanent without Union."

So he basically says lets go back to 1860. Although after 3 bloody hard fought years I doubt the Confederates would have just said ok. Too much blood had been spilled on both sides, imo, to not see through to total victory.  So I'm not sure how realistic McClellan's view was.

Last edited on Fri Dec 21st, 2012 03:07 pm by BHR62

 Close Window