View single post by Hellcat
 Posted: Tue May 21st, 2013 04:44 pm
 PM  Quote  Reply  Full Topic 
Root Beer Lover

Joined: Tue Nov 15th, 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 981

  back to top

Looking back I have to wonder how a 12 x 14 dwelling and growing of crops was "improving" the land. Of course in 1863 they didn't have a way of knowing how the growing of crops could have disaterous results for the Great Plains.

And as the article points out, there were loopholes here. The first of which being the minimum size of the dwelling. Does it have to be 12' x 14' or can you say a minimum of 12" x 14" and then build a 9' x 11' cabin? Technically 9' x 11' fits the wording of the legislation as it is more than a minimum 12 x 14 dwelling if the legislation is interperted in inches. Clearly the legislation was meant to be in terms of feet as what human can live in a dwelling 12" x 14", but this wasn't specified and thus left room for the arguement that without that specification any dwelling over 12" x 14" fit. And at same time someone could build a bird house fiting those measurements in inches and still argue they had built a dwelling on the land, thus meet the required dwelling to improve the land.

 Close Window