View single post by javal1
 Posted: Wed Dec 20th, 2006 08:29 pm
 PM  Quote  Reply  Full Topic 
javal1
Grumpy Geezer


Joined: Thu Sep 1st, 2005
Location: Tennessee USA
Posts: 1503
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 

  back to top

Amen Burnside - nice to know I'm not totally alone in that feeling. There are folks, including many on this board, that fought it because they thought it somehow affected historic preservation. I disagree, but I have no qualms with them.

What needs to be understood is the issue brought out alot of what I call "born-again" preservationists - people who oppose gambling for religious or "moral" reasons and suddenly discovered historical preservation, and used it, because it met their agenda. You will never hear from these people again in regards to preservation issues. These are the people I have contempt for. They were nowhere to be found when other major preservation issues were being fought. The fact that there won't be a casino in GB doesn't bother me, I'm a thousand miles away. If there would have been one, it wouldn't have bothered me. The pure adulterated hypocrisy of many who fought against it under false pretenses bothers the hell out of me.

 Close Window