View single post by Regina
 Posted: Sun Jan 7th, 2007 04:30 pm
 PM  Quote  Reply  Full Topic 

Joined: Wed Nov 1st, 2006
Location: Connecticut USA
Posts: 65

  back to top

I would like to "weigh in" on the debate about whether the "better" general was Grant or Lee.  I'm not sure, though, because what constitutes being the "best"?  Most battles won, or fewest number of casualties, or most aggressive, or most committed to the cause.... I could go on and on but my point is, until that is defined, it really can't be argued.  Is there a good overall definition somewhere out there for me to use?

 Close Window