 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
$user_title
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
It is good news but it is disturbing that it seems the fact the land had a Civil War connection was not a determining factor in saving it by a narrow vote, rather it was traffic concerns.
It's also disturbing that the Planning Commission voted in FAVOR of it and out of the 12 total people on commissions and councils who had a say in this, half of them were for it.
But a win's a win.