 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
Member
| Joined: | Sun Oct 22nd, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2027 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Ole
Last edited on Mon Apr 23rd, 2007 04:01 am by ole
| View single post by ole | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Apr 23rd, 2007 03:56 am |
|
||||||||||||
|
ole Member
|
Very much agreed, Jim. I saw no egregious, historical errors. Things I would have to quibble over would have added an our to the movie and made it quite tedious. I 'spect those neophytes who watched will have developed a new appreciation of Sherman's March. Of course, in this community of freaks, wackos, and devotees, we'll continue to quarrel over it, but I am really looking for a public response emulating the Ken Burns series of years ago. Ole Last edited on Mon Apr 23rd, 2007 04:01 am by ole |
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||