View single post by Albert Sailhorst
 Posted: Wed May 23rd, 2007 01:51 pm
 PM  Quote  Reply  Full Topic 
Albert Sailhorst

Joined: Mon Sep 12th, 2005
Location: Aledo, Illinois USA
Posts: 559

  back to top

David, Thanks!....I kind of understand what you're saying, but I am still confused. If Artilce II, Section I is read this way, in my way of thinking, it still suggests succession (which makes me further agree with you that it is thrown into ambiguity!):

In case of the...... inability to discharge the powers and duties of the said office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President.......

The "and" part, to whic you refer, says to me that both President and VP would have to resign, die or otherwise become incapacitated in order for Congress to declare what officer shall act as President.

Again, I agree with you as to it being ambigious.....I reckon that's why there's a Supreme Court; to iron this stuff out!

I suppose it's like arguing Seccession (again, as you suggest, and I agree!) can be justified, and, at the same time, not justified!



Albert Sailhorst

 Close Window