 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 23rd, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 222 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Best
Rob
| View single post by booklover | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Sep 18th, 2007 11:32 pm |
|
||||||||||||
|
booklover Member
|
As an avid fan of "This Old House" and other shows of that genre, I am often amazed at what restrictions are placed on homes in historic districts. I can understand not wanting to paint a federal style home shocking pink, but I often come away from such discussions with the idea that "I am paying out the wazoo for this house, so however I want to fix it up is my business." Of course, I don't live in a historic district...heck I don't even live in a house (mobile home). I can understand wanting to maintain historic architectural integrity, and in many cases I will even applaud it, but sometimes I get the feeling that many of those "enforcers" of historic integrity take things a bit too far. Best Rob
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||