|View single post by ole|
|Posted: Tue Nov 27th, 2007 03:36 pm||
|Doc C wrote:
Good to see responses. To stir the pot - states rights had every thing to do with this country's founding.
Am more than glad to have a rip-snortin' discussion on something other than NASCAR, fat Santas, and miscellaneous idiots. I'm ready to be persuaded. Perhaps I misread your first post in that I was thinking CW as opposed to founding. Of course, the founders from each state were very much concerned with what they would have to give up to create a union.
One key question - did the federal govt. have control over domestic policy, as preferred by the federalists. In the minds of Jefferson/Madison (republicans), if this occurred, slavery was doomed. Many Virginians were initially staunch federalists but with time they could see the proverbial righting on the wall if they continued their support of the federalist position. The establishment of banks by the federal govt. signaled to the republicans that the govt. could extend its authority wherever it wished, thus to slavery. Again, to the founders who had overall sovereignty - the state or the federal government??
I'm confused on the time-line here. During the writing and ratification, how could they know that "banks....signaled...that the government could extend its authority wherever it wished, thus to slavery"?
Slavery and to a certain extent treatment of native americans were very much indeed considered problems during the this period. Benjamin Franklin urged congress to take up the question of the slave trade as well as the persistence of slavery itself in any self-respecting American republic. If Washington was not concerned with the rights of native americans, why would he have devoted so much his time while president on the treaty with the Creek Nation.
I wasn't saying Washington, as president, wasn't concerned with treatment of aboriginal peoples. But this is again a time-line thingy, How deeply was Washington involved in the writing of the Constitution? And slavery, while many thought it should be set on the road out, was accepted so as to get the southern states into agreement.
The founding fathers did "diddle" with the issue of slavery. Virtually all of the most prominent founders recognized that slavery was an embarrassing contradiction that violated the principles the American Revolution claimed to stand for.
As stated earlier, they tried. But it was either give up anti-slavery language or give up union. They opted for union and left the question for later generations, hoping that it could be resolved amicably. I can't fault the founders for not solving the question because I can't see what they could have written that the Old South would have accepted.
Just random thoughts.