| View single post by JoanieReb | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri Nov 30th, 2007 08:27 pm |
|
||||||||||||
|
JoanieReb Member
|
Since it is obviously incongrous with the rest of the States Rights and Slavery thread, I guess I should step out of the shelter of said thread to continue with the "author bias" train of thought, which started with this exchange: Ole: " Among the stable of published historians, name one who writes with a bias." Me: James M. McPherson. Rightfully, Ole asked me defend this charge, and we had a couple more back-and forth's. Maybe no one but Ole and I are interested in this one, so I'll start slow, but I already have plenty more in my arsenal. Simply this to begin with: in the preface to The Illustrated Battle Cry of Freedom, page XIII, the iconic McPherson states, ".....I have chosen a narrative framework to tell my story and point it's moral" (italics mine). Since when is it the unbiased historian's job to openly moralize? I do think of McPherson as more a socialogist than historian, but that is a relatively small point. Anyway, there's my opener, can continue on if called on to do so. Joanie Last edited on Sat Dec 1st, 2007 12:23 am by JoanieReb |
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||