| View single post by HankC | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Dec 10th, 2007 03:31 pm |
|
||||||||||||
|
HankC Member
|
Actually, southern yeoman farmers tend to be more upset at intra-state slaveholders than many suppose. there are 2 main reasons: 1) slaves are considered property but not taxed as such. Hence, slave-holders property is under-represented on the tax rolls. 2) slaves *are* counted for representational purposes, just as in Congress. Hence, slave counties tend to be over-represented in the state general assembly. The sectional north-south difference is not the only split over slavery. Every southern state dealt with regional resentment between the slave- and non-slave-holding areas. HankC
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||