| View single post by Bama46 | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Dec 15th, 2007 02:20 pm |
|
||||||||||||
|
Bama46 $user_title
|
The principal difference between the effectiveness of saber vs. pistol, as I understand it, is the issue of training. A recruit of that era could be reasonabley expected to know at least the rudiments of marksmanship, whereas the use of a saber would require a great deal of training and practice. According to the sources I have read, the pistol was favored because of basic firepower.... a Colt, Remington, or other "6 shooter" and a carbine equaled 7 shots before reloading. The LeMat was a 9 shot and then the shotgun for a total of 11 rounds (with the carbine also) The shotgun on the LeMat was used as a last ditch self preservation tool
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||