Civil War Interactive Discussion Board Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register

Darkest of Days

 Moderated by: javal1
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Black Confederates  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Thu Jun 18th, 2009 01:19 am
  PM Quote Reply
1st Post
Naim Peress
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 17th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 60
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I wrote a blog post today (http://www.civilwaretal.blogpost.com) about how unlikely it was that tens of thousands of blacks fought in the Confederate Army. I talked about the Cleburne monograph and Judah Benjamin's January 1865 speech in the African Church and the reaction to it.  Tell me what you think and why you think it.  I'm interested in other opinions.   

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Thu Jun 18th, 2009 03:05 am
  PM Quote Reply
2nd Post
borderuffian
Member


Joined: Fri Mar 13th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 58
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
From your article-

"Four days after Benjamin's speech, the Confederate Senate drafted a resolution stating,'Judah P. Benjamin is not a wise and prudent Secretary of State and lacks the confidence of the country.' "
=============================

I looked this up in the Journal of the Confederate Congress.  Such a resolution was proposed but it was voted down.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Thu Jun 18th, 2009 03:09 am
  PM Quote Reply
3rd Post
borderuffian
Member


Joined: Fri Mar 13th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 58
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Naim Peress wrote: I wrote a blog post today (http://www.civilwaretal.blogpost.com) about how unlikely it was that tens of thousands of blacks fought in the Confederate Army. I talked about the Cleburne monograph and Judah Benjamin's January 1865 speech in the African Church and the reaction to it.  Tell me what you think and why you think it.  I'm interested in other opinions.   

Who is being counted?

Those who were in actual military service?....or anyone who picked up a musket during a battle?

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Thu Jun 18th, 2009 11:54 am
  PM Quote Reply
4th Post
Naim Peress
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 17th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 60
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Thanks for the reply.  It is true that the resolution was voted down but it reflected the lack of confidence in Benjamin's leadership.  He felt the need to resign shortly afterward.  He drafted his resignation letter but President Davis rejected it.  Do you think it would have made a difference in the outcome of the war if Benjamin's policy had been adopted?

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Thu Jun 18th, 2009 11:56 am
  PM Quote Reply
5th Post
Naim Peress
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 17th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 60
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
That is an excellent question.  I don't know the answer because a census was never taken of black members of the Confederate army.  How do you think historians should count it?  This is an important question now in Civil War history. 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 01:27 am
  PM Quote Reply
6th Post
CleburneFan
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 30th, 2006
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 934
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I am a purist when it comes to counting strength of the armed forces in the Civil War. I would count African-Americans who fought for the South IF and only IF they had been officially mustered into the service either by conscription or as volunteers. They would have to have a rank, wear a uniform, and be assigned  to a company, regiment, division and corps. They would be entitled to at least some pay for their service and perhaps eventually entitled to a pension, however small.

African-Americans who did not meet those criteria but "helped out" in an informal manner in some battles or skirmishes either armed or using improvised weapons such as pitchforks and so on, do not count as actual Armed Forces. 

Those African-Americans who worked as cooks, teamsters, blacksmiths, laborers and the like without actually holding rank would be CIVILIAN labor that accompanied the Confederate army either voluntarily or under force. Most of the time, in the South such civilians would be non-combatants.

One reason would be that many Southerners were reluctant to arm their slaves and ex-slaves for combat for fear that the arms would be turned against the whites. When Patrick Cleburne made the controversial proposal to arm African-Americans, his proposal was considered to be so inflammatory that Jefferson Davis ordered that it be supressed and never discussed.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 12:53 pm
  PM Quote Reply
7th Post
Naim Peress
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 17th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 60
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I agree with you.  Your criterion makes a lot of sense.  Thanks for the comment. 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 01:35 pm
  PM Quote Reply
8th Post
borderuffian
Member


Joined: Fri Mar 13th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 58
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Black involvement in the Confederate army was varied:

Slaves

Servant

Cook, Teamster, Musician-  Enlisted or hired out by slaveowner.

Free Blacks

Servant (hired)

Cook, Teamster, Musician-  Enlisted or hired.

Private (enlisted)

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 02:09 pm
  PM Quote Reply
9th Post
j harold 587
Member
 

Joined: Tue Jun 12th, 2007
Location: Wilmington, Ohio USA
Posts: 119
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I must agree with Cleburne fan to be a member of the armed forces one would receive pay, be carried on a unit muster role, and hold a rank. If teamsters, cooks, laundresses, servants, and other types of camp followers are to be counted, then the truck drivers, catering staff, laundry providers, and other CIVILIAN support staff who support our military all over the wourld  would be considered military personell.

I understand that personell in those positions may have come under fire or responded in an armed manner, however they should not be considered soldiers.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 02:16 pm
  PM Quote Reply
10th Post
Naim Peress
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 17th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 60
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Aside from the Melungeons (I believe that is the spelling), there were no black soldiers in the Confederate army. Your list spells out what they could do.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 03:01 pm
  PM Quote Reply
11th Post
borderuffian
Member


Joined: Fri Mar 13th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 58
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Naim Peress wrote: Aside from the Melungeons (I believe that is the spelling), there were no black soldiers in the Confederate army. Your list spells out what they could do.
http://www.civilwarinteractive.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=2121&forum_id=1&jump_to=23655#p23655

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Jun 19th, 2009 10:24 pm
  PM Quote Reply
12th Post
Albert Sailhorst
Member


Joined: Mon Sep 12th, 2005
Location: Aledo, Illinois USA
Posts: 353
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I wrote this in another forum here on CWI a few moths ago. I think it partially relates to the topic.

"The website for the SCV Camp 469 of Rome, GA (http://scvcamp469-nbf.com/hollandservice.htm) presents the following in relation to a black Confederate's grave:

"Sunday, September 08, 2002

    The time came for Creed Holland to get the recognition he was due. He was a black slave, but also a Confederate soldier. And for such, Creed Holland was honored Saturday morning at a graveside ceremony in a small cemetery behind Riverview Baptist Church in Rocky Mount. 

    The Jubal Early chapter of the United Daughters of the Confederacy 
dedicated Confederate memorial markers to Creed Holland and two other 
black Confederate soldiers, also named Holland, from Franklin County. 

    Hazel Holland Davis, a member of the Jubal Early chapter and 
great-granddaughter of a Confederate soldier, organized the service as 
part of a chapterwide project to identify Confederate soldiers' graves in 
Franklin County. 

    The three Holland soldiers, of no known relation to each other or 
to Davis, worked as slaves on Thomas J. Holland's 732-acre farm in Glade 
Hill. Thomas Holland was Davis' great-great-grandfather. 

    The service was a rare memorial that honored the little-known Confederate soldiers: enslaved black soldiers. 

    About 45 Confederate re-enactors and members of the United Daughters of 
the Confederacy and Sons of Confederate Veterans performed the ceremony, 
which included poems, speeches, prayers and customary military funeral rites such as cannonball volleys and rifle shots." 


The article goes on in other detail (but I felt was too long to continue quoting here)."


Also, on the same forum, I posted:

"An intersting PDF file from the North Carolina Dept. of Cultural Resources, dated Feb. 2002 (http://www.ncdcr.gov/news/2003/opa_2-26-03.pdf):

"Among the records in North Carolina’s archives that document African Americans’ service are newspaper enrollment notices that give times for free Negroes to enlist in the Confederate Army, correspondence, Confederate pension applications, and depositions. Some military records note that slaves helped to construct forts or do other work at military facilities. Other documentation can be found in the “North Carolina Troops, 1861-1865,” a 15-volume set of reference books that chronicles Confederate servicemen and includes the names of black soldiers."



"In some instances, officials even denied the existence of black Confederate soldiers. For instance, Sarah Venable, widow of John W. Venable, applied for a widow’s pension. Venable is listed in the “North Carolina Troops, 1861-1865,” as a member of Company H, 21st Regiment N.C. Troops. The roster shows that he was “Negro, enlisted June 5, 1861. No further records.” However, John Sawyer, a white Confederate veteran who served with Venable, submitted a deposition as part of Sarah’s application stating that he knew John Venable, and that Venable had “made a good soldier.” Yet the claim was disallowed with the notation, “No law for this.”


Any thoughts???

Last edited on Fri Jun 19th, 2009 10:26 pm by Albert Sailhorst

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sat Jun 20th, 2009 02:20 am
  PM Quote Reply
13th Post
Naim Peress
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 17th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 60
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I'm glad these men did receive the honors they deserve, albeit belatedly. 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Jun 20th, 2009 05:29 am
  PM Quote Reply
14th Post
Johan Steele
Life NRA,SUVCW # 48,Legion 352


Joined: Sat Dec 2nd, 2006
Location: South Of The North 40, Minnesota USA
Posts: 949
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.civilwarinteractive.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=1845&forum_id=1&highlight=%26quot%3BBlack+Confederate%26quot%3B

 

An old closed thread w/ more info than you can want in one place.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sat Jun 20th, 2009 02:08 pm
  PM Quote Reply
15th Post
Naim Peress
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 17th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 60
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I can see the amount of debate.  I can also see that you've done a lot of reading on the topic.  I'm impressed. 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

Current time is 02:45 pm  
Civil War Interactive Discussion Board > Civil War Talk > General Civil War Talk > Black Confederates Top



Lead Theme By: Di @ UltraBB
UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.2390 seconds (9% database + 91% PHP). 26 queries executed.