Civil War Interactive Discussion Board Home
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register


Error on Page 197 of Bill O'Reilly's Book "Killing Lincoln." - Civil War Books - Civil War Entertainment: Books, Movies, Music & Art - Civil War Interactive Discussion Board
 Moderated by: javal1
 New Topic   Reply   Printer Friendly 
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Sun Oct 16th, 2011 12:28 am
   PM  Quote  Reply 
1st Post
CleburneFan
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 30th, 2006
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 1021
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 

  back to top

Noted Fox News political commentator Bill O'Reilly and a collegue Martin Dugard have just released a new book "Killing Lincoln" about the conspiracy to assassinate Lincoln, Seward and Johnson plus the manhunt, trial and execution afterward.

O'Reilly's forward dated April 3, 2011, states the book is "written as a thriller" but asks the reader not be fooled by the style. He says the book is "uncompromising and unsanitized." He calls it a "no spin American story,"
going on to state he is proud of the book.

I couldn't wait to read the book because this is a part of American history that fascinates me. I was hoping that O'Reilly and Dugard might have something new to bring to the table about this subject, perhaps definitive new research or a new interpretation of events surrounding the conspiracy.

What I did find in my close reading of the book is an error on page 197 of the hard bound edition. This page deals with the history of the house called "Old Clubhouse" in which Secretary of State William Seward lives.

O'Reilly writes "Tragedy paid a visit to the building in 1859 when a congressman shot his mistress's husband on a nearby lawn. The husband, Philip Barton Key, was a United States attorney and the son of Francis Scott Key, who wrote 'The Star Spangled Banner.' Key's body was carried inside the club where he passed away in a first-floor parlor."

The three persons involved in the scandal O'Reilly writes about are in error. The unnamed Congressman was Daniel Sickles, later Major General Sickles. Who the congressman shot was NOT his mistress's husband but his own wife Teresa's lover, Philip Barton Key.

Sickles would later stand trial and be acquitted using the first known successful temporary insanity defense.

I was surprised to see such an error in a best selling history book. I looked in the back of the book to see where O'Reilly attributes this information, but the style is different than more exacting history books. O'Reilly and Dugard list books they read for each chapter of this book, but it is left to the reader to read those books too and seek possible references for statements in the book.

Fortunately I have read several, though not all, of the books the authors site such as "April 1865" by Jay Linik, "American Brutus" by Michael W. Kauffman and "Manhunt" by James L. Swanson.

O'Reilly and Dugard do give the reader with some interest in the national trauma of Lincoln's assassination, a fascinating and fast paced presentation of the topic. However, for those that have read "American Brutus" or "Manhunt" or even "April 1865, "Killing Lincoln" may seem like little more than a review or amalgam of those books and others on the topic.

As for the error, it makes one wonder about some other facts in the book, but without specific attributions in the back, one will need to research further any material covered that seems vague or has been treated differently by other authors.

If you are curious about the book and want to read it yourself, here is some information: "Killing Lincoln", Bill O'Reilly and Martin Dugard. Henry Holt and Company, LLC, New York, copyright 2011. $28.00. (I purchased my copy at Amazon.com.)

I hope some of you will read "Killing Lincoln". I would love to know of you see the book in a different way than I do.



 Posted: Thu Oct 20th, 2011 10:10 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
2nd Post
ole
Member


Joined: Sun Oct 22nd, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 2027
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 

  back to top

Sickles would later stand trial and be acquitted using the first known successful temporary insanity defense.
And his attorney was Stanton.



 Posted: Fri Oct 21st, 2011 07:31 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
3rd Post
Cogswell Pepperbox
Did I Fire 6 Shots or Only 5 ?


Joined: Mon Oct 4th, 2010
Location:  
Posts: 28
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 

  back to top

Wait, what ?
Bill O'Reilly playing loose & fast with the facts,
promulgating errors without sourcing ?

Shocking.



 Posted: Fri Oct 21st, 2011 11:29 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
4th Post
CleburneFan
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 30th, 2006
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 1021
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 

  back to top

Cogswell Pepperbox wrote:
Wait, what ?
Bill O'Reilly playing loose & fast with the facts,
promulgating errors without sourcing ?

Shocking.


Even more shocking to me is that two authors wrote this book and neither one caught this error.:D

Maybe that is why facts aren't attributed. If the facts don't exist, they can't be attributed.



 Posted: Fri Oct 21st, 2011 11:33 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
5th Post
CleburneFan
Member


Joined: Mon Oct 30th, 2006
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 1021
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 

  back to top

ole wrote:
Sickles would later stand trial and be acquitted using the first known successful temporary insanity defense.
And his attorney was Stanton.


Hi, Ole. It has been a long time.

Anyway, speaking of Stanton, I think he certainly merits an exhaustive biography. He is such a fascinating character and is connected with controversies that could benefit from research.



 Posted: Mon Oct 24th, 2011 02:50 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
6th Post
Old North State
Member
 

Joined: Fri Feb 20th, 2009
Location: Tennessee USA
Posts: 77
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 

  back to top

"Ditto" on the need for a Stanton biography.



____________________
"While we live we will cherish, protect and defend her."


 Current time is 06:08 pm
Top




UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.4778 seconds (33% database + 67% PHP). 28 queries executed.