Civil War Interactive Discussion Board Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register


 Moderated by: javal1 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2   
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Question on Civil War Documents  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Sun Feb 3rd, 2013 12:27 pm
  PM Quote Reply
21st Post
Hellcat
Person


Joined: Tue Nov 15th, 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 680
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Oh, sorry, TD. I thought you meant you had no idea of him being in prison, not of if the disability could have landed him in prison for re-enlisting in a different unit.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue Feb 5th, 2013 08:37 pm
  PM Quote Reply
22nd Post
MildMan
Just Testing Ideas
 

Joined: Wed Jul 23rd, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 66
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Here is the info for Eugene from the Historical Data Systems Civil War database.

These could be the same person. I have seen soldiers discharged for disability reenlisting later in the war. Mauston is just 60 or so miles from Columbia County so he might have traveled to enlist where bounties were highest. Pretty good sums were being paid in 1863 and service in heavy artillery was seen as a pretty safe gig. Grant, of course, changed all that in 1864. I agree that MO is usually short hand for Mustering Out. Remaining at a Military prison while the rest of the unit MOs, doesn't sound good.

Eugene Perham

Residence Columbia County WI;
Enlisted on 10/4/1861 as a Private.
On 10/4/1861 he mustered into "I" Co. WI 8th Infantry
He was discharged for disability on 10/11/1862

Eugene Perham

Residence Mauston WI;
Enlisted on 7/20/1863 as a Private.
On 7/20/1863 he mustered into "C" Co. WI 1st Heavy Artillery
He was discharged on 9/21/1865
(Absent at Mil. prison at M. O. of Battery)

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue Feb 5th, 2013 08:40 pm
  PM Quote Reply
23rd Post
MildMan
Just Testing Ideas
 

Joined: Wed Jul 23rd, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 66
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Oh yes, and Texas Defender. I think this is further proof that in 1861, secession was illegal. :)

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Feb 8th, 2013 12:45 pm
  PM Quote Reply
24th Post
Texas Defender
Member


Joined: Sat Jan 27th, 2007
Location: Texas USA
Posts: 832
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
MildMan-

  I don't see how the service of a young enlisted man in a Wisconsin unit (Or two) has any bearing on the question of the legality of secession. As usual, you make an outlandish statement that has nothing to back it up. But, I guess, you are: "Just Testing Ideas."

Last edited on Fri Feb 8th, 2013 01:00 pm by Texas Defender

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri Feb 8th, 2013 02:16 pm
  PM Quote Reply
25th Post
Mark
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 30th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 434
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
TD, I'm fairly certain he is joking...

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Feb 8th, 2013 02:24 pm
  PM Quote Reply
26th Post
Texas Defender
Member


Joined: Sat Jan 27th, 2007
Location: Texas USA
Posts: 832
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Mark-

  Perhaps you are correct. Perhaps I should have tried to see some humor in MildMan's last offering because, based on my previous exchanges with him, its hard to take his postings seriously. But, in this case, I believe that its simply a gratuitous provocation masquerading as an attempt at humor.

  In any event, he would do well not to engage in: "Sniping", especially on threads that are totally unrelated to the topics that he brings up.

Last edited on Fri Feb 8th, 2013 11:33 pm by Texas Defender

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

Current time is 09:18 am Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2     
Civil War Interactive Discussion Board > Civil War Talk > General Civil War Talk > Question on Civil War Documents Top



Lead Theme By: Di @ UltraBB
UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.2894 seconds (16% database + 84% PHP). 26 queries executed.